LET360 owl LET360

GenEd Philippine History — LET Practice Questions

This GenEd Philippine History section of the LET General Education exam covers 11 expert-reviewed practice questions. Each question has a plain-English explanation and notes on why the wrong answers are wrong.

11 reviewed questions on GenEd Philippine History — and over 300 across General Education overall — are available with a free LET360 account. Sign up free →

Sample questions with answers and explanations

Sample 1

Who is known as the "Brains of the Katipunan"?

Answer: B

Emilio Jacinto is called the "Brains of the Katipunan" because he wrote the Kartilya — the small booklet of rules and ideals that every new Katipunero had to learn. He also drafted the group's code and edited Kalayaan, the Katipunan's newspaper. He was only about 19 when he became Bonifacio's closest adviser. The trap here is Apolinario Mabini, who has a very similar nickname — "Brains of the Philippine Revolution" — but he served Aguinaldo's revolutionary government, not the secret Katipunan society that came before it.

Why the other choices are wrong
  • A. Andres Bonifacio is the founder and "Supremo" of the Katipunan, not its brains.
  • C. Apolinario Mabini is the "Brains of the Philippine Revolution" (Aguinaldo's government), not the Katipunan — this is the most common trap.
  • D. Marcelo H. del Pilar was a Propaganda Movement leader (La Solidaridad), not a Katipunero.

Sample 2

The controversy regarding the 'First Mass in the Philippines' revolves around which two competing locations?

Answer: C

Historians have long debated where the first Catholic Mass in the Philippines was celebrated on March 31, 1521. Two locations are claimed: Limasawa (in Southern Leyte) and Butuan/Masao (in Mindanao). The Philippine government's National Historical Commission has officially sided with Limasawa, based on the journals of Pigafetta and other expedition members which describe a small island matching Limasawa's location and features. Local Butuan tradition continues to dispute this, however, citing other evidence.

Why the other choices are wrong
  • A. Manila and Cebu are major colonial cities but not the candidates in the first-Mass debate.
  • B. Mactan and Bohol have other historical significance (Mactan: Lapu-Lapu's victory; Bohol: blood compact) but aren't the first-Mass dispute.
  • D. Cavite and Corregidor are later-period sites, not connected to the 1521 first Mass.

Sample 3

Which historical document provides a detailed account of the customs, traditions, and social hierarchy of the Tagalogs during the early Spanish period?

Answer: B

'Relacion de las Costumbres de los Tagalos' (1589) was written by Franciscan friar Juan de Plasencia, who lived among the Tagalogs in the early Spanish colonial period. The document describes pre-Hispanic Tagalog society in detail: social classes (datu, maharlika, timawa, alipin), customary laws, marriage practices, religious beliefs, and political organization. Despite its colonial-Christian frame, Plasencia's work is one of the most valuable primary sources for understanding indigenous Philippine society as it existed at the moment of Spanish contact. Filipino historians read it carefully, both for what it captures and for the colonial bias it carries.

Why the other choices are wrong
  • A. Antonio de Morga's 'Sucesos de las Islas Filipinas' (1609) is a different colonial-era text — broader history of the Spanish in the Philippines.
  • C. 'The Philippine Islands 1493-1898' by Blair and Robertson is a 20th-century English compilation of colonial documents, not a single primary source.
  • D. 'Ang Dapat Mabatid ng mga Tagalog' is a 19th-century essay by Andrés Bonifacio — much later than Plasencia.
Want all 11 questions on GenEd Philippine History plus timed practice tests?
Sign up free with Google →

Related topics